On Wednesday 21 May 2014 20:44:04 Tom H wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 21.05.2014 15:31, schrieb Tom H: > >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern > >>> systemd/gnome3-environment? > >>> > >>> # glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for > >>> # POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink). > >>> # (tmpfs is a dynamically expandable/shrinkable ramdisk, and will > >>> # use almost no memory if not populated with files) > >>> tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs > >>> nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0 > >>> > >>> > >>> /dev/cdrw /media/cdrecorder auto > >>> user,exec,noauto,managed 0 0 > >> > >> From "src/core/mount-setup.c": > >> > >> { "tmpfs", "/dev/shm", "tmpfs", > >> "mode=1777", MS_NOSUID|MS_NODEV|MS_STRICTATIME, NULL, > >> MNT_FATAL|MNT_IN_CONTAINER }, > > > > So the answer is "no" ? > > The answer is "no" unless you want to apply different perms to "/dev/shm".
I went through a new installation recently and seem to recall that the fstab was rather empty from its usual entries. Will older installations eventually get an enotice to this effect with baselayout updates? -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
