On Tuesday 26 August 2014 18:25:00 Kerin Millar wrote: > On 26/08/2014 17:49, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > So all this has been for nothing. I was sure I'd set 1.x metadata when > > creating the md device, but I must eat humble pie and glare once again at > > my own memory. > > Not to worry. However, I still think that it's a bug that mdadm behaves > as it does, leading to the curious behaviour of the mdraid script. > Please consider filing one and, if you do so, cc me into it. I have an > interest in pursuing it.
Done: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521280 -- Regards Peter
