On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:06:20PM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 08:47:31 AM Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen > > > > <h.v.bruineh...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > > '-fstack-protector-strong' is supported as of gcc-4.9.x - unless you > > > upgrade, you'll forced to use the regular one. > > > > > >... > > > > > > I think it's not even that unlikely that you don't even want the strong > > > version. > > > > Ironically enough, your last sentence overflowed my parsing stack. :) > > > > -- > > Rich > > I am guessing: > " I think it is not unlikely that you don't want the strong version" > > parses to: > > " I think it is likely that you don't want the strong version " > or: " I think it is unlikely that you want the strong version" > > ?
Thanks for translating me! ;-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
