On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Alan Mackenzie <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, everybody.
Good day. > instead of conceptualising a "branch" (as you would do with Mercurial, > Bazaar, Subversion, or even CVS), you need to think about "commits > reachable from a certain head (excluding commits reachable from some > other head)". I actually see that as a more flexible approach. git is designed to be distributed and that's what everyone loves about it. For everything: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/802573/difference-between-git-and-cvs http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2011/06/09/git-lessons-learned/ Cheers, konsolebox
