On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 19:37:31 -0500, Mike Edenfield wrote:

> Has anyone ever pointed out that "init thingy" actually takes more 
> effort to type than "initramfs" or "initrd"?

But less than "initramfs or initrd". How about init*?

Or is this another reason not to use one? ;-)


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Intel: where Quality is job number 0.9998782345!

Attachment: pgpzY6LKW6xqK.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to