On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 04:12:59 -0500, Dale wrote:

> Dang.  I had to add about 90 packages to my package.use and some more to
> the keyword file. 
> 
> I wonder if make.conf would be better in my case too?  My use file just
> grew my a huge amount. 

You package.use has grown by one filesystem block at most, how much extra
disk space and CPU cycles would you use by compiling 32 bit options for
every package that has them?

If you use a single file for package.use, it does make it far more
cumbersome to manage, but that's why I switched to separate files many
years ago.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Sigh - An amplifier for people who suffer in silence

Attachment: pgpFFffxI4U1d.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to