Am Thu, 02 Apr 2015 10:48:13 +0100
schrieb Peter Humphrey <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk>:

> On Wednesday 01 April 2015 19:12:14 Marc Joliet wrote:
> > Am Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:29:15 +0100
> > 
> > schrieb Peter Humphrey <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk>:
> > > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 10:53:15 Marc Joliet wrote:
> > > > Am Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:43:21 +0100
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > > Apparently it's (partially) due to CONFIG_GENTOO_LINUX_PORTAGE (not
> > > > 
> > > > CONFIG_GENTOO_LINUX_INIT_SCRIPT as I originally thought):
> > > >     Selects: CGROUPS [=y] && NAMESPACES [=y] && IPC_NS [=y] && NET_NS
> > > >     [=y]
> > > 
> > > Hmm. I have no instances of PORTAGE in my 3.18.9 .config; was this
> > > introduced in 3.19?
> > 
> > I had to check my kernel config archive, but I found the answer to be
> > "yes".
> 
> I was hoping that equery c gentoo-sources would tell you. Never mind - 
> thanks anyway.

Ha! I think I made it sound like more work than it really was:

% grep PORTAGE /etc/kernels/*
/etc/kernels/kernel-config-3.19.2-gentoo:CONFIG_GENTOO_LINUX_PORTAGE=y
/etc/kernels/kernel-config-3.19.3-gentoo:CONFIG_GENTOO_LINUX_PORTAGE=y

And you're welcome :) .

-- 
Marc Joliet
--
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup

Attachment: pgptdDb5_cker.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Reply via email to