On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:49:19 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:

> > Running without -v doesn't help. I almost never use -v with emerge,
> > it's output is verbose enough as it is and burying useful messages in
> > even more trivial, not-for-users output makes decoding it even harder.
> > 
> > emerge really needs an option to hide such "informational"
> > messages.   
> 
> I disagree. emerge really needs to have it's output redesigned from
> scratch. Right now it arrives at the conclusion (the top) and dumps it's
> data tree bottom-up, apparently stopping halfway and never getting to
> output what the top is.

Well ,yes. But it also needs an option to hide QA and trivial info
messages. Having the same message pop up every time I run emerge,
because of a package I know I masked is annoying enough, but the
confusion it causes to many users is far more annoying.
 
Yes, I agree it needs a full overhaul of the way it communicates what is
happening.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

A Smith & Wesson beats Four Aces everytime.

Attachment: pgpg3iqvTspRq.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to