Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Peter Humphrey <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk> > wrote: >> On Monday 10 August 2015 09:13:01 Dale wrote: >> >>> I might add, sync is taking a LONG time again. Of course, my DSL is a >>> bit slower than some folks. At least the bumpy road got smoothed out >>> tho. It seems to be working again. Maybe next sync will be back to >>> normal. >> I do one sync a day, of my LAN server, and sync anything else to that. I >> don't >> know how long it took today because I have it on a cron job at night. :-) >> > Well, if you synced with all broken manifest files, and re-synced with > all fixed manifest files, you'd expect one file to be updated for > every package in the repository, so that would be a long sync (but not > quite as long as the original one). > > This was never intended to be a user-visible change (hence no news, > etc). The digest issue was an oversight which was fixed. At this > point rsync should work as it always did, minus one really long sync. > > The main thing you'll probably see is that the headers of the ebuilds > all contain git hashes instead of cvs revisions. >
What I was expecting, one longer than usual sync maybe and even more likely, a config update so that some change takes effect. I expected something to change but wasn't expecting what I got for sure. That had me wondering. We all good now tho. < thumbs up > Dale :-) :-)
