On 9/25/05, Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 25 September 2005 23:29, Mark Knecht wrote: > > Why is it that some updates are not found by --deep, not found by > > --update, but then found by --deep --update together? > > --deep doesn't work without --update. This will be addressed at some stage, > although perhaps not with the functionality you'd expect. --deep without > --update would only install any missing dependencies. > > -- > Jason Stubbs
Ah, so it was my understanding that --deep searched for anything that needed to be updated, but rather what it does (today) is search for only things that are missing? In that case these results makes far more sense. Essentially I should always invoke --update before using --deep. Thanks! Cheers, Mark -- [email protected] mailing list
