On 11/10/2015 00:13, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:04:40 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >>> The only difference between those two ebuilds is a slight change in >>> the way the ncurses DEPEND is defined. It's hard to say more without >>> seeing the full output but you could try re-emerging ncurses. > >> It's a bug in the ebuild and should be reported: >> >> < >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r3[abi_x86_32(-)] >> --- >>> || ( >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r3:0/5[abi_x86_32(-)] >>> =sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r3:5/5[abi_x86_32(-)] ) >> >> >> khamul env # eix ncurses >> [I] sys-libs/ncurses >> Available versions: >> (0) 5.9-r3 (~)5.9-r4 5.9-r5(0/5) (~)6.0-r1(0/6) >> (5) 5.9-r99(5/5) (~)5.9-r101(5/5) (~)6.0(5/6) >> >> >> The two versions in the || in the ebuild are the same, except one is >> SLOT 0 and the other 5, and neither have sub-slot 5. This is impossible >> to satisfy. > > > Don't 5.9-r5 and 5.9-r101 satisfy the dependency? > >
<doh> must be the hangover from last night's dodgy beer... There's ">=" there that I totally missed. Sorry for the noise... -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
