On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:47:44 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >>> I was just checking out on other forums; chromium is an open source > >>> and not very well maintain. www-client/google-chrome suppose to be > >>> better. > >> > >> On what is that claim based? Chromium used the chrome source code > >> with the proprietary bits removed and the same versions of both are > >> available in portage. > > > > ...and I'm for ever having to recompile chromium as it seems to > > change about once a week. Not what you would call poorly supported.
> Well the OP did say that the info came from "other forums" and we know > how reliable those can be. Exactly, that's why I asked for some detail. > I'd trust my mother-in-law's opinion on the state of Chromium before I > trust $RANDOM_ARB_FORUM_ON_TEH_INTARWEBZ This is just a random claim without even a citation from such a forum. Hell, it even implies that being open source is bad, it's a good thing we have closed source alternatives like Firefox... -- Neil Bothwick Politics: Poli (many) - tics (blood sucking parasites)
pgpsLj3WfLBXE.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
