On Thursday 29 September 2005 00:32, Bryan Whitehead wrote: > > no, but I noticed, that reiserfs needs much less space with small files > > (like portage tree) than ext2/3. > > The only problem with this "solution" is you are then stuck using > reiserfs... > > </fsflamewar> :D
better than stuck with ext3 ;) http://bugzilla.kernel.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=OPEN&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=product&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=ext3&field0-0-1=component&type0-0-1=substring&value0-0-1=ext3&field0-0-2=short_desc&type0-0-2=substring&value0-0-2=ext3&field0-0-3=status_whiteboard&type0-0-3=substring&value0-0-3=ext3 they are ALL buggy - choose your poison ;) I have choosen reiser, because space is important for me - and I have a nice tape-drive, which makes backup/restore very easy... but to be honest, I never had reiserfs-bugs.. only hardware errors... -- [email protected] mailing list
