On Thursday 16 Jun 2016 15:27:29 James wrote: > José Maldonado <josemald89 <at> gmail.com> writes: > > The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new: > http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/goodbye-apt-and-yum-ub > untus-snap-apps-are-coming-to-distros-everywhere/ > > "Snaps now work natively on Arch, Debian, Fedora, Kubuntu, Lubuntu, > > Ubuntu GNOME, Ubuntu Kylin, Ubuntu MATE, Ubuntu Unity, and Xubuntu," > > Canonical's announcement says. "They are currently being validated on > > CentOS, Elementary, Gentoo, Mint, OpenSUSE, OpenWrt and RHEL, and are > > easy to enable on other Linux distributions." (Ubuntu will continue to > > support deb packages, but developers can choose to package applications > > as snaps instead of or in addition to debs.)" > > > > Gentoo is supporting officially Snap packages? Why not Flatpak? > > > > Thank you very much for your responses! Bye! :) > > One word SECURITY? Trust but verify does come to mind.
Keylogger in a snap anyone? > Containers are not exactly the most secure apparatus, imho. > "Clair is an open source project for the static analysis of vulnerabilities > in appc and docker containers." [1]. So, I want to hear about the robustness > of the security on these 'self containerd packages. > What exactly creates the codes necessary for the container ? > > Is their a version that works on gentoo-hardened? > > Suggestions for firewalling off a system for routine, deep examination > and profiling of port activities, would be most welcome. Prima facia, > I just have no trust in wonderful ideas from the *buntu crowd, ymmv. > > Also, it's a really good idea; now maybe *DALE* can get his security > VM, in a snap (snapple?, snapit?, snapper?), that is gentoo-hardened > blessed? Maybe the snhap designation for secured (Hardeded) snaps? > Maybe if it's a hardened, entertainment (video snap) we call them schnapps? > > I've been bantering about for a couple of years now how clusters (hpc and > containers) are going to change everything. Security is the main obstacle > now. You know, I'm ready to sip this Kool_aid and ponder the > possibilities.... > > Were are all the security gurus on at on snaps? Do snaps require systemd > or are they PID-1 agnostic? > > > > James > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/coreos/clair -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
