On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 08:10:25 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > The full output of emerge, with the --tree option, would put these > > messages in context. > > > >> sys-fs/eudev:0 > >> > >> (sys-fs/eudev-3.1.5:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled > >> in by (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this > >> slot) > >> > >> (sys-fs/eudev-3.1.5:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by > >> > >> >=sys-fs/eudev-1.3:0/0[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?,static-libs?] > >> >required by (virtual/libudev-215-r1:0/1::gentoo, installed) > > > > This one is usually caused by mismatched USE flags on the virtual and > > the choice you have installed. Make sure virtual/libudev and eudev > > have the same USE flags, otherwise portage will try to install udev > > instead.
> And tried "--tree" option as you suggested. I was doing "@world"
> But have learned from previous post I have do do in smaller sections so
> going with @system is showing me the some packages wants to go with
> "udev" instead of "eudev"
>
> [blocks B ] sys-fs/udev ("sys-fs/udev" is blocking
> sys-fs/eudev-3.1.5)
There must have been something before this. Show the full output, which
tells us exactly what portage wants to do, and use -v so all USE flags
are shown.
> * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
> * installed at the same time on the same system.
>
> (sys-fs/eudev-3.1.5:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>
> >=sys-fs/eudev-1.3:0/0[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?,static-libs?]
> >(>=sys-fs/eudev-1.3:0/0[abi_x86_32(-),abi_x86_64(-)]) required by
> >(virtual/libudev-215-r1:0/1::gentoo, installed)
> sys-fs/eudev required by @selected
>
> (sys-fs/udev-225-r1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
> in by
>
> >=sys-fs/udev-208-r1:0/0[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?,static-libs?]
> >(>=sys-fs/udev-208-r1:0/0[abi_x86_32(-),abi_x86_64(-)]) required
> >by (virtual/libudev-215-r1:0/1::gentoo, installed)
I still suspect a USE flag mismatch here. What does
grep -r udev /etc/portage
show?
To repeat what I said before, a virtual and the package satisfying it
must have matching USE flags. If your flags for virtual/libudev and eudev
don't match, portage will try to install the default for libudev, which
is udev. That then causes a conflict as you can't have udev and libudev
installed at the same time.
--
Neil Bothwick
Ninety-Ninety Rule Of Project Schedules - The first ninety percent of
the task takes ninety percent of the time, and the last ten percent
takes the other ninety percent of the time.
pgpDKGzZELK62.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
