On 170513-12:53-0500, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Miroslav Rovis
> <miro.ro...@croatiafidelis.hr> wrote:
> > On 170510-20:03-0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 01:35:24PM -0500, R0b0t1 wrote
> >>
> >> > The option is "-fdiagnostics-color=never" or "-fno-diagnostics-color".
> >> > You can also set the environment variable GCC_COLORS to the empty
> >> > string. The latter is probably more useful in the context of portage.
> >>
> >>   Thank you.  I successfully tried...
> >>
> >> GCC_COLORS="" emerge icewm
> > Another tip to remember.
> >
> >>   I suppose the next step is to add GCC_COLORS="" to make.conf.
> >>
> > I wonder why sticking " --color=n" in the EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS in
> > make.conf (e.g. mine is:
> >
> > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--keep-going --with-bdeps=y --autounmask-keep-masks 
> > --ask --verbose --color=n"
> >
> > does only partly its job. Erratically, I'd say. You never know if it
> > will or not remove color... A bug should be posted for that, but I have
> > a partly broken system at this time...
> >
> 
> That switch only handles the coloring of portage output. I suggested
> using GCC_COLORS precisely because "--color=n" doesn't seem to
> propagate to subcommands which do output coloring.
> 
> Another program you might want to disable output coloring for is
> CMake, using CMAKE_COLOR_MAKEFILE=OFF.
> 

Thanks for the tip! But let me see... Like the above (repasting):
> >> GCC_COLORS="" emerge icewm
pr maybe stick in the /etc/portage/bashrc or in some other way?

-- 
Miroslav Rovis
Zagreb, Croatia
https://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to