On Thursday 25 May 2017 04:45:24 Martin Vaeth wrote: > Andrew Savchenko <birc...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > For similar needs I found zswap the most suitable, it's so much > > > better than zram: > This sounds like one is an alternative to the other. > This is not the case. It can even make sense to use them together. > For instance, the swap device necessarily required for zswap > can be a zram device. Whether this is advantegous depends on your > usage pattern and swappiness value.
Do either of these reduce the effect of (spinning) drive thrashing and desktop latency increasing when swapping takes place? -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
