[email protected] wrote:
> On 07/20 04:51, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 19/07/17 19:57, [email protected] wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> My Buspirate v36a needs a newer firmware.
>>> Unfortunately the flasher software is only
>>> available in 32bit and I run a 64bit modern
>>> Gentoo.
>> Is this the tool?
>>
>> https://github.com/DangerousPrototypes/Bus_Pirate/blob/master/package/BPv3-firmware/pirate-loader_lnx
>>
>> That is a dynamically linked executable. I just ran it on my 64-bit Gentoo:
>>
>>
>> $ ./pirate-loader_lnx
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Pirate-Loader for BP with Bootloader v4+
>> Loader version: 1.0.2 OS: Linux
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> pirate-loader usage:
>>
>> ./pirate-loader --dev=/path/to/device --hello
>> ./pirate-loader --dev=/path/to/device --hex=/path/to/hexfile.hex [
>> --verbose
>> ./pirate-loader --simulate --hex=/path/to/hexfile.hex [ --verbose
>>
>>
>
> Now it this case changes from "weird" to "mysterious":
>
> I downloaded that file. Here it has the checksum (md5)
>
> 97122ea9062bbabcd04b2ffdee7b1bb8 pirate-loader_lnx
>
> "file pirate-loader_lnx"says:
> pirate-loader_lnx: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV),
> dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, with
> debug_info, not stripped
>
> but "ldd" states:
> ldd ./pirate-loader_lnx
> not a dynamic executable
>
>
> How can "dynamically linked" and "not a dynamic executable" can be
> true simultanously?
>
> By the way: Executing that version prints
> zsh: no such file or directory: ./pirate-loader_lnx
> [1] 13112 exit 127 ./pirate-loader_lnx
>
> (I tried this bash with the same rsult. Seems not to be a shell
> interference here...)
>
> Now it looks like a problem on my system...but everything works fine
> here (beside the already reported problems while compiling
> screen/lynx)....
>
>
> Cheers
> Meino
>
First, I'm pretty clueless on what you are doing but notice something
that just may be related. Do you have zsh installed on your system? It
says zsh can't be found basically so perhaps it needs to be
installed??? I checked, I don't have it installed here but Nikos may
have it installed on his rig for some reason.
* app-shells/zsh
Available versions: 5.0.5 5.2 ~5.2-r1 ~5.3 ~5.3.1 **9999 {caps
debug doc examples gdbm maildir pcre static unicode}
Homepage: http://www.zsh.org/
Description: UNIX Shell similar to the Korn shell
Again, I'm pretty clueless on this but thought maybe it might help. If
not related, ignore me. lol I have no clue what I'm talking about. ROFL
Dale
:-) :-)
