On 29 July 2017 at 12:19, Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 29 July 2017 at 12:03, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Don't use kmail >> >> Seriously, why are putting up with the pain that POS is causing you? >> You've been posting about serious kmail and akonadi issues for about 4 >> years now if memory serves, and it has never gotten better. It probably >> never will :-) >> >> It must be well more than 4 years. What can I say, you are right, I must > be glutton for punishment. LOL! > > TBH, it has been serving me fine for quite a few years now, although the > migration to akonadi was a painful affair by all accounts. This was > originally caused by me using POP3 and a tonne of filters. I moved to > IMAP4 and few filters and it all worked relatively painlessly since. > > This however must be a postgresql related error, as it worked fine before > I removed version 9.5. Any idea what this "Invalid database object during > initial database connection" might be and how to recover from it? >
Hmm, even more symlinks have been broken, This time I spotted /usr/bin/psql pointing to a non-existent ../lib64/postgresql-9.5/bin/psql. I came across it when I tried to connect to the database manually and couldn't run psql, but could run psql96. I'm still not sure if I did something wrong this time during the upgrade and migration and what it might have been, of if something else is amiss and merits a bug report. akonadi is still uncooperative. :-( It must be related to whatever it runs to start postgres. -- Regards, Mick
