On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: >> >> If there were some kind of trade-off I'd see the argument, but the >> worst case here is just that they may or may not need it. For >> something with some benefit and almost no drawback that seems like a >> wrong reason to avoid LVM. >> > > Sure, it may help a very tiny percentage of people but I suspect it will > be tiny. Mostly, for the same reasons I pointed out in another reply on > this thread. >
IMO the important question isn't how many it helps, but how many it hurts. If it helps a tiny number, and it hurts none, then it is a worthwhile default. -- Rich
