On 10/16/2017 09:42 PM, Philip Webb wrote: > 171016 Ian Zimmerman wrote: >> ~$ time equery -Cq b /usr/bin/equery >> app-portage/gentoolkit-0.4.0 >> real 0m27.594s >> user 0m8.780s >> sys 0m0.456s > > My desktop machine has : > > CPU : AMD X8 FX8370E 8-core 4,3 GHz 16 MB 32 nm 95 W > SSD : Kingston SSDNow V300 240 GB SATA RW 450 MB/s > > And I get : > > root:530 ~> time equery -Cq b /usr/bin/equery > app-portage/gentoolkit-0.4.0 > real 0m6.362s > user 0m5.845s > sys 0m0.178s > > but also NB : > > root:533 ~> time equery b /usr/bin/equery > f^C * Searching for /usr/bin/equery ... > app-portage/gentoolkit-0.4.0 (/usr/bin/equery -> > ../lib/python-exec/python-exec2) > real 0m3.776s > user 0m3.651s > sys 0m0.092s > > How reliable is 'time' (smile) ? >
Just a couple more data points, on my machine, with:
CPU : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6850K CPU @ 3.60GHz
SSD : Crucial MX200 1 TB SATA
And a hot cache:
$ time equery -Cq b /usr/bin/equery
app-portage/gentoolkit-0.4.0
dev-lang/python-exec-2.4.5
real 0m6.655s
user 0m6.462s
sys 0m0.193s
$ time equery b /usr/bin/equery
* Searching for /usr/bin/equery ...
app-portage/gentoolkit-0.4.0 (/usr/bin/equery ->
../lib/python-exec/python-exec2)
dev-lang/python-exec-2.4.5 (/usr/lib/python-exec/python-exec2)
real 0m6.598s
user 0m6.439s
sys 0m0.160s
$ time portageq owners / /usr/bin/portageq
sys-apps/portage-2.3.11
/usr/bin/portageq
real 0m1.391s
user 0m1.348s
sys 0m0.044s
$ time qfile /usr/bin/qfile
app-portage/portage-utils (/usr/bin/qfile)
real 0m0.104s
user 0m0.085s
sys 0m0.019s
I think we have a winner here... qfile even takes the same -C and -q
options as equery.
--
Jonathan Callen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
