On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Walter Dnes <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 06:55:45AM -0700, Rich Freeman wrote > >> This should work: >> git clone git://anongit.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git . >> git checkout 4716c9ae8666e4cfc6eff46960f7bff8f4f3d708. > > That worked, thanks. Now on to the next problem. I ran repoman, and > got a whole slew of errors. I stripped down the KEYWORDS line to > "amd64" in both ebuilds, but repoman is still getting errors. I am > *NOT* running "hardened" or "selinux"... > > ======================================================================== > RepoMan scours the neighborhood... >>>> Creating Manifest for /usr/local/portage/app-emulation/qemu > dependency.bad [fatal] 8 > app-emulation/qemu/qemu-2.9.0-r2.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) > ['sec-policy/selinux-qemu'] > app-emulation/qemu/qemu-2.9.0-r2.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) > ['sec-policy/selinux-qemu'] > app-emulation/qemu/qemu-2.9.0-r2.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) > ['sec-policy/selinux-qemu'] > app-emulation/qemu/qemu-2.9.0-r2.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) > ['sec-policy/selinux-qemu'] > app-emulation/qemu/qemu-2.9.0-r55.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) > ['sec-policy/selinux-qemu'] > app-emulation/qemu/qemu-2.9.0-r55.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) > ['sec-policy/selinux-qemu'] > app-emulation/qemu/qemu-2.9.0-r55.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) > ['sec-policy/selinux-qemu'] > app-emulation/qemu/qemu-2.9.0-r55.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) > ['sec-policy/selinux-qemu'] > ebuild.minorsyn 1 > app-emulation/qemu/qemu-2.9.0-r55.ebuild: Useless blank line on line: 210 > > Note: use --include-dev (-d) to check dependencies for 'dev' profiles > > Please fix these important QA issues first. > RepoMan sez: "Make your QA payment on time and you'll never see the likes of > me." > ========================================================================
I'd just ignore these. They would only matter if if you were running selinux. I wouldn't report these to the maintainer as this isn't the current package version. -- Rich
