On 21/11/2017 15:03, Mick wrote:
> I see that <media-libs/gst-plugins-bad-1.11.90:1.0 is blocking media-libs/gst-
> plugins-base-1.12.3, so I removed various gst-plugins and net-libs/farstream, 
> emerged -1 media-libs/gst-plugins-base-1.12.3, but portage continues to 
> complain, with backtrack=99 or not.
> 
> What is the way to overcome this?
> 
> =================================
> # emerge @preserved-rebuild -v -a
> 
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> 
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild  N     ] media-libs/gst-plugins-bad-1.10.5:1.0::gentoo  USE="X bzip2 
> egl introspection nls opengl orc vnc wayland -gles2 -gtk {-test} -vcd" 
> ABI_X86="(64) -32 (-x32)" 0 KiB
> [ebuild  N     ] media-plugins/gst-plugins-libnice-0.1.13-r100:1.0::gentoo  
> ABI_X86="(64) -32 (-x32)" 0 KiB
> [ebuild  N     ] media-libs/gst-plugins-good-1.10.5:1.0::gentoo  USE="nls 
> orc" 
> ABI_X86="(64) -32 (-x32)" 0 KiB
> [ebuild  N     ] net-libs/farstream-0.2.8-r1:0.2/5::gentoo  
> USE="introspection 
> {-test} -upnp" 0 KiB
> [ebuild   R    ] net-im/pidgin-2.12.0:0/2::gentoo  USE="dbus gstreamer gtk 
> ncurses nls spell xscreensaver (-aqua) -debug -doc -eds -gadu -gnutls -
> groupwise -idn -meanwhile -networkmanager -perl -pie -prediction -python 
> -sasl 
> -silc -tcl -tk -zephyr -zeroconf" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7" 0 KiB
> [blocks B      ] <media-libs/gst-plugins-bad-1.11.90:1.0 ("<media-libs/gst-
> plugins-bad-1.11.90:1.0" is blocking media-libs/gst-plugins-base-1.12.3)
> 
> Total: 5 packages (4 new, 1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 KiB
> Conflict: 1 block (1 unsatisfied)
> 
>  * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
>  * installed at the same time on the same system.
> 
>   (media-libs/gst-plugins-base-1.12.3:1.0/1.0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>     media-libs/gst-plugins-base:1.0 required by (net-im/
> pidgin-2.12.0:0/2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
>     >=media-libs/gst-plugins-base-1.4:1.0 required by (net-libs/
> farstream-0.2.8-r1:0.2/5::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
>     >=media-libs/gst-plugins-
> base-1.10.5:1.0[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]
>  
> (>=media-libs/gst-plugins-base-1.10.5:1.0[abi_x86_64(-)]) required by (media-
> libs/gst-plugins-good-1.10.5:1.0/1.0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
>     media-libs/gst-plugins-base:
> 1.0[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]
>  
> (media-libs/gst-plugins-base:1.0[abi_x86_64(-)]) required by (media-plugins/
> gst-plugins-libnice-0.1.13-r100:1.0/1.0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
>     >=media-libs/gst-plugins-
> base-1.10.5:1.0[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?,introspection?]
>  
> (>=media-libs/gst-plugins-base-1.10.5:1.0[abi_x86_64(-),introspection]) 
> required by (media-libs/gst-plugins-bad-1.10.5:1.0/1.0::gentoo, ebuild 
> scheduled for merge)
> 
>   (media-libs/gst-plugins-bad-1.10.5:1.0/1.0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for 
> merge) pulled in by
>     >=media-libs/gst-plugins-bad-1.4:1.0 required by (net-libs/
> farstream-0.2.8-r1:0.2/5::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
> =================================
> 


There's no obvious reason why portage should select
media-libs/gst-plugins-bad-1.10.5, and gst-plugins has updated cleanly
for me for months now. By I'm on ~arch and your packages are arch. Can
we re-check the obvious?

emerge --sync up to date?
emerge world done? Often times I find a partial update fails whereas all
of world succeeds, it checks all the deps and misses none
Any mixture of ~arch packages related to pidgin, farstream, gst-plugins?
Any of those packages keyworded/masked/unmasked on your system?

and finally, to see what might want gst-plugins-bad:
equery depends gst-plugins-bad

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com


Reply via email to