On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 06:55:30PM +0000, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:12:07 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > Well, as long as we're explaining grammar, I'll elaborate a tiny bit > > more since a lot of people (including native English speakers) get > > these wrong. > [snip] > > I figured that would make > > the example more confusion which would defeat the purpose. > ~~~~~~~~~ > > MUPHRY'S LAW: The principle that any criticism of the writing of others > will itself contain at least one grammatical error. > > And don't get me started on people using "which" when they should be using > "that". > > (In this case, which is correct but it should have a preceding comma).
When your reading this sentance, you fill find their are definately some errors in it’s spelling. That is a art less and less people can make proper use of. *SCNR* PS.: As a non-native, I always found e.g. and i.e. easy to keep apart because when you say "e.g." as a word without the dots, it becomes "eg", which, phonetically, is the start of the word "example". -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. The higher the qualification, the higher-grade the mistakes.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
