On 02/04/2018 12:21:13 AM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
On 04/02/18 01:34, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 02/03/2018 04:11:33 PM, Marc Joliet wrote:
>> Am Samstag, 3. Februar 2018, 10:50:53 CET schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
>> > On 02/03/2018 06:54:06 AM, Dale wrote:
>> > > While on this topic, I have a question about glibc. I have it
set in
>> > > make.conf to save the binary packages. Generally I use it
when I
>> need
>> > > to go back shortly after a upgrade, usually Firefox or
something.
>> > > However, this package is different since going back a version
isn't a
>> > > good idea. My question tho, what if one does go back a
version using
>> > > those saved binary packages? Has anyone ever did it and it
work or
>> > > did
1. do another backup
2. take your last good binary package and unpack it in the root
directory - it is an "image" of that package as it sits in the file
system.
3. rebuild that version of glibc by overiding emerge - comment out
"die
"aborting to save your system" in
/usr/portage/eclass/toolchain-glibc.eclass
I have done this a couple of times with gcc (when manual deletes have
gone rogue) but it should work with glibc as you have not recompiled
any
new packages.
Many thanks Bil,
Helmut
