gevisz wrote: > 2018-03-25 21:40 GMT+03:00 Franz Fellner <alpine.art...@gmail.com>: >> Just a stupid question: Did you add =scrnsaverproto-1.2.2-r1 to >> package.mask? > No. Actually, I do not need screensaver at all. > >> Because the -r2 is stable and nothing should prevent it from being merged... > But something does prevent it from being merged. > >> I am running partly testing and the time xorg-proto was added I had to deal >> with hard blocks which I circumvented by un-keywording (remove from >> package.accept-keywords) and selectively masking. > I have not understood the above comment. > But I prefer to stick with stable versions of all packages. >
I would try the -t option to see what is pulling it in. That may shed some light on the problem. Won't hurt anything if it doesn't work either. Dale :-) :-)
