-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi,
Am Mo den 25. Jun 2018 um 22:02 schrieb Ian Zimmerman: > > I did some profiling now. > > > Any idea why there is that difference in call time? > > Is it the same upstream version of python? You never really stated this > in the thread. I did profiling with python 2.7 and 3.5. As 3.5 is slightly slower than 2.7, it doesn't matter to much. Also I tried to compare the different function calls between 2.7 and 3.5, but they are the same. So, the output I posted was in fact from 3.5 on Gentoo and 2.7 on Debian but as the difference of 2.7 and 3.5 is just around 5% - 10% I did not mentioned that (apology about that, I even seen my fault here after the post). What I can try is to do them on the same machine. On one of my systems I saved the old debian volume so I could just chroot into the debian tree and do the same over there. But as the results so far are that catastrophically, I think that it will be not that difference overall. Regards Klaus - -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen <[email protected]> Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Charset: ISO-8859-1 iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEEMWF28vh4/UMJJLQEpnwKsYAZ9qwFAlsxXaAACgkQpnwKsYAZ 9qx5oAv/QsUsNaGKORsD7l16cVPiJYknkOTo/L9GwKpql3AWGQbZJ89Rk+Nf0id+ ggRN7dd5fAn9IbF6VKSNl87Jp5Gon40q5LBPuVnzK5wSmXoDElqhK85RqE7Zj4Ak DlZJnOJI7q9jC0s1vvji22cNV7dcteQoK/JteVBQ6T1a4m4BRuCtUqjGT6L5lZ1t UgxwBHVIumMyl4HL24bcpvze8sGtXTHHU5d3nrH5rtQ4g2OBy9ycnCtUNhh37R6g IxQ2qHjbPRYpabXLXNG6NvH7mVEKoOdogBECjFFweXyeq9ZsaJwAXSpF18qO9bP/ MQKDZyfGuSZFJeuTb2ifulFM/ptTFDcUPtuJxHrZs4F8fxjf/fG3N6tbU/XMgmx0 E5Bq8SwS/+4G23NAsX0JE236uFarf0fgcGTVisdeR4EHqvUUI5SV7hRgxXmgR9B8 ZUhKpuHfnhs0Xl1Vmq6rapM3xkszwjzl0xClPWNWNdyquTAXhVBNfAAiHBcDk1Cc txKS70sk =H7kt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
