On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:21:38 -0700, Grant Taylor wrote:

> > It sounds like ecryptfs would suit your needs best. As it works on 
> > directories, you don't need separate mount points for each encrypted 
> > directory.  
> 
> The last time I looked at eCryptFS it /did/ need mount points for 
> accessing the unencrypted contents.  But you don't need to dedicate an 
> entire file system to the encryption.

Sorry, poor choice of words. I really meant separate filesystems. Of
course each mounted ecrypts directory needs a mount point!


-- 
Neil Bothwick

deja vous - the act of forgetting someone's name /again/ despite being
introduced to them several times.

Attachment: pgpcgTlO613TJ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to