On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 08:03:30AM +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jun 2019 18:49:48 -0400
> Jack <ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> 
> > On 2019.06.06 18:38, Ilya Trukhanov wrote:
> > > Namely x11-libs/libX11 and dev-libs/glib:
> > > 
> > > - libX11 failed during configure because it couldn't find xcb;
> > > - glib failed during configure because it couldn't find libmount.
> > > 
> > > Looks like it is an order issue, because after rebuilding
> > > x11-libs/libxcb and sys-apps/util-linux, both libX11 and glib built  
> > > just
> > > fine.
> > > 
> > > Should I report bugs for these? The news item says:
> > >   
> > > >If you have any problems with the new profiles or the migration
> > > >procedure, please report a bug and make it block the tracker.  
> > > 
> > > But I'm a little reluctant to do so for various reasons.
> > >   
> > I'm in the same situation.  I've had several rebuild failures that  
> > succeeded after re-emerging one/some of what they depend on, although I  
> > would have expected those to also be rebuilt.
> > 
> > I wonder if the instructions should be "emerge -1 --deep /lib32  
> > /usr/lib32" ?  I'll have to try it once I'm done with the current set  
> > of emerges.
> > 
> > Anyway - it probably does make sense to file the bug - the worst they  
> > will do is close it as not a bug, and hopefully at least tell you what  
> > you should have done to avoid the problem.
> > 
> 
> I think the emerge command as stated in the news item is incomplete
> as emerge does not pick correct rebuild order (it assumes all packages
> are installed and in order, thus picks arbitrary rebuild order).
> 
> Try to add --complete-graph to it:
>     emerge -1 --deep --complete-graph /lib32 /usr/lib32
> 
> -- 
> 
>   Sergei
> 

Unfortunately this still doesn't guarantee the correct build order for
me. I wonder if running emerge with --keep-going a few times would work in
this situation?

It might be a good idea to mention this issue somewhere on the wiki or in a
follow-up news item. I doubt we're the last to face this problem now
that 17.1 profiles are stable.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to