Hello, Dale.

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:12:32 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Howdy,

> I been working on the profile switch.  I followed the directions in the
> news item up until the rm part in #12.  I did a equery b for a few files
> in the two directories and it has files that equery shows belonging to
> packages.  They are not orphans since they are owned.  Here is a list of
> the files:

> root@fireball / # ls -al /lib32/
> total 3956
> drwxr-xr-x 14 root root    4096 Jun 17 23:14 .
> drwxr-xr-x 22 root root   36864 Jun 17 01:18 ..
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root      12 Jun 17 19:25 cpp -> /usr/bin/cpp
> drwxr-xr-x  3 root root    4096 Jun 17 19:46 dhcpcd
> drwxr-xr-x 70 root root   12288 Jun 17 19:19 firmware
> drwxr-xr-x  2 root root    4096 Jun 17 19:21 gentoo
> drwxr-xr-x  3 root root    4096 Dec  9  2010 grub
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root       0 Nov 17  2010 .keep

[ .... ]

> -rw-r--r--  1 root root      773 Jun 17 02:51 tclooConfig.sh
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root       17 Jun 17 03:22 terminfo -> ../share/terminfo
> drwxr-xr-x  2 root root     4096 Jun 17 21:35 tmpfiles.d
> drwxr-xr-x  2 root root     4096 Apr  1 06:50 upower
> drwxr-xr-x  2 root root     4096 Jun 17 10:55 vdpau
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root      266 Jun 17 03:26 xml2Conf.sh
> root@fireball / #


> As one can see, some of those could be important.  I noticed grub,
> nvidia, dracut and others that could cause issues if they failed.  Is it
> really safe to just rm them or did I miss something?  Do I need to do
> something else not mentioned in the news item for this? 

At this stage, /lib32 should be a symlink.  I think that step 12 means
just the symlink should be removed, NOT all the stuff inside what it
points to.

So I think what you should do is:

    $ rm /lib32

, but definitely NOT a recursive rm on that symlink.

I had to remove one of these two symlinks by hand (I can't remember
which one), and I've not had any trouble since.  ("Since" meaning Saturday
evening.)

> The rest of the todo list worked fine. I'm just concerned about removing
> these files when they are owned by packages. 

> Thoughts?? 

As above, DON'T remove the files, just the symlink.

> Dale

> :-)  :-) 

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

Reply via email to