On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:34:25PM -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > Renat Golubchyk wrote: > >On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:26 -0400 "Eric S. Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >wrote: > >>The problem was /etc/init.d/net.eth0 and /etc/init.d/net.lo were the > >>same. The net.eth0 code was overwritten with the lo code. > >> > >>This happened on two machines and I'm wondering how it happened? Did > >>something go wrong in the emerge process? There's no sign of any > >>attackers. > > > >They are always the same since net.eth0 (and all other net.<interface>) > >is a symlink to net.lo. > > then that's what broke. net.lo looks like it should and my net.eth0 > looks like: >
Is net.eth0 a symlink to net.lo? If not, remove net.eth0 and symlink it to net.lo. If net.eth0 is already a symlink, then something is seriously wrong, since the file you just showed us was definitely not the 2005.1 one. W -- AlexMc: Physics? Physics is EZ.. M: The Langrangian is self evident. AlexMc: Well... not that easy. Sortir en Pantoufles: up 2 days, 12:37 -- [email protected] mailing list
