чт, 9 апр. 2020 г. в 10:32, Nuno Silva <nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt>:
>
> On 2020-04-09, gevisz wrote:
>
> > ср, 8 апр. 2020 г. в 19:31, gevisz <gev...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> ср, 8 апр. 2020 г. в 18:13, Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org>:
> >> >
> >> > The other thing you should be aware of is that dev-lang/julia is, from a
> >> > software engineering point of view, an absolute trainwreck (upstream,
> >> > not the Gentoo maintainer's fault). Your experience so far is going to
> >> > be typical, I fear.
> >>
> >> After I added all these files to the
> >> /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords/julia file,
> >> julia finally emerged. Thank you. However, I am affraid what will be
> >> when I try to update my Gentoo system in a month or so.
> >
> > A small addition: I've just noticed that I've managed to emerge only
> > julia-1.3.0;
> > julia-1.4.0-r1 still fails to be emerged (at a compile phase).
>
> What errors?
>
> There is bug 716434[1] where julia fails because it tries to download
> more tarballs (yes, during compilation). An ebuild change was made to
> address this, so it might be worth syncing the tree and trying to emerge
> again.

Thank you. I will try.

> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=716434

Reply via email to