On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:03:39 -0400,
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> On 4/22/20 11:58 AM, John Covici wrote:
> >
> > Yes, portage agrees with that statement, maybe I didn't give you the
> > whole log, I thought it said that in there -- I did see that, I am
> > sure. My question is how does this work normally, when you merge a
> > package and update is this not always the case that there are files
> > owned by the previous version on the system?
> >
>
> Yeah, but the package manager knows which files are owned by the version
> being replaced and it doesn't complain about those.
That makes no sense to me -- portage itself says those files are owned
by 14.7.1965(14) so if its telling me that why does it not just
replace those files?
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covici wb2una
[email protected]
