On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 12:49, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:55:46 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > And today, pam and pambase are restored to their earlier versions > > because sddm requires them. But sddm has not changed versions, so why > > did portage want to upgrade pam and pambase on Wednesday? > > The sddm ebuild has changed without changing the version > > - pam? ( sys-libs/pam ) > + pam? ( <=sys-libs/pam-1.3.1_p20200128-r1 )
I only got a message about skipping sddm on my world update, so apparently I'm now running an unsupported pam version. Rebooting worked just fine though, so what I gain/lose by staying like this is unknown. Regards, Arve
