caveman رجل الكهف wrote:
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 2:50 AM, Dale <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Some sites won't work without java
> sometimes i disable javascript only to solve the
> easier captcha, then once i solve it, i get the
> malfunctioning site, but at least the cookies get
> installed!  then i enable it again and refresh the
> site.
>
> sometimes this doesn't work, as goog sometimes
> calls me "malicious activity" (how dare me disable
> js for a few seconds).  it works sometimes though.
>
>
>

I tried that on a couple sites and all I get for a page is a notice to
turn on javascript to use the site.  It loads nothing else.  It's a good
idea and I wish sites wouldn't force java on everyone, it has its issues
from what I've read, but it seems some think they own the computers
people use to surf the internet with as well as their own.  One reason I
hate ads and some of the java stuff, it makes sites so annoyingly
flashy.  It's hard to read what you came for when you have a flashing ad
or some other element distracting you. 

While sites may think ads help them, it doesn't with me.  I built my
first rig in 2003.  While at first I didn't use adblock, I've never once
clicked on any ad, not once.  It's my unconditional rule.  If I want to
buy something, I have sites I go to for that.  If it's computer or
electronic related, newegg or tigerdirect is my main sites but sometimes
I find things elsewhere.  Some things, ebay, amazon etc.  If they went
to the trouble to send my screen a million ads over the years, not one
of them has ever been clicked.  I know, I'm weird.  They have their
rules, I have mine.  If they ever get it to where sites are user
friendly when it comes to ads, maybe I'll change.  I don't see them ever
changing and that means I won't be either. 

This new captcha thingy is just annoying as heck.  It's yet another
thing that needs to hit the road and leave drag marks. 

Thanks for the hint.  Maybe it will work on some other sites.  It's
worth trying at least. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 

Reply via email to