On 10/30/05, Qian Qiao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, i top post, just for you, :)
You can post how you like. Please dont change your ways on my accord. > > Imagine someone who wasn't following the thread need to do to pick up this > thread: > 1. Scroll all the way to the bottom, read Ted's message. > 2. Scroll a bit upwards, to read you message > 3. Then scroll all the way to the top, to read mine. > > I can hardly say it is *logical* to read a thread backwards. Another > example: try to name one forum/BBS system that displays the newest reply on > the top when viewing a thread. > > BTW, how did you like my HTML? I bet you enjoyed it. Um did you not read my previous message? Obviously not, mate... I agree with you on the HTML, gmail enabled it by default. I disabled it after you pointed it out, so thank you. > You just don't understand that most people dislike top-posting and HTML > messages for a reason. You've got every right to use whatever you wish in > your personal mails, but this is a public list, try to be considerate mate. Quite honestly top, middle or bottom posting all seems indifferent to me. Correct me if I am wrong here but I thought the information was the important part of the message not whether it is located at the top or at the bottom? Hmmm guess I was wrong, I now be more considerate and concern myself with the layout of my messages rather then helping people. In the interests of keeping you happy and god forbid all other people who are more concerned with layout happy I will cease my evil ways of top posting. Rav -- "When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows", people just stare at you blankly and say "Hey, I got those with the system, for free". - Linus Torvalds, 1995 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
