On Mon, 2020-12-21 at 13:21 +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Is wpa-supplicant a good idea? That's what the handbook recommends, but I 
> think I remember 
> something like wicd being better.

It depends on your needs.

If you're only going to connect to one or two networks, using
wpa_supplicant and learning wpa_cli will be managable.  The Arch wiki
has an excellent step-by-step wpa_cli example.

However, if you're travelling from place to place and hopping networks,
then you may find that kind of maintenance tedious and opt to use
wpa_gui instead.  It certainly isn't fancy but it is featureful and
user-friendly.


Reply via email to