Hello,

As part of my update procedure I do a "eclean-dist --destructive --verbose" at the end when everything is updated and runs OK.

Since some weeks I am getting the following message when running eclean-dist (I was thinking this maybe would resolve it self after a while...): "The following unavailable installed packages were found
x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.11".

This is happening on two different machines with different GPU-Cards.
One with an AMD/ATI (Radeon) and one with Intel+NVIDIA
(the output below is from the AMD/ATI machine).

Looking at "eix x11-base/xorg-server" it shows me that there is an update from 1.20.11 to 1.20.13-r1 available, but when I run "emerge --verbose --ask --oneshot x11-base/xorg-server --verbose-conflicts"

I get the following:

-----------------------------8<----------------------------------

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.13-r1:0/1.20.13::gentoo [1.20.11:0/1.20.11::gentoo] USE="elogind suid udev xorg -debug -dmx -doc -ipv6 -kdrive -minimal (-selinux) -systemd -test -unwind -xcsecurity -xephyr -xnest -xvfb (-wayland%*)" 5’003 KiB

Total: 1 package (1 upgrade), Size of downloads: 5’003 KiB


!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:

x11-base/xorg-server:0

(x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.13-r1:0/1.20.13::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) USE="elogind suid udev xorg -debug -dmx -doc -ipv6 -kdrive -minimal (-selinux) -systemd -test -unwind -xcsecurity -xephyr -xnest -xvfb" ABI_X86="(64)" pulled in by
    x11-base/xorg-server (Argument)

(x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.11:0/1.20.11::gentoo, installed) USE="elogind suid udev wayland xorg -debug -dmx -doc -ipv6 -kdrive -minimal (-selinux) -systemd -test -unwind -xcsecurity -xephyr -xnest -xvfb" ABI_X86="(64)" pulled in by x11-base/xorg-server[wayland(-)] required by (kde-plasma/kwin-5.22.5:5/5::gentoo, installed) USE="multimedia plasma -accessibility -caps -debug -gles2-only -handbook -screencast -test" ABI_X86="(64)"






x11-base/xorg-server:0/1.20.11= required by (x11-drivers/xf86-video-amdgpu-21.0.0:0/0::gentoo, installed) USE="udev" ABI_X86="(64)" ^^^^^^^^^^^

x11-base/xorg-server:0/1.20.11= required by (x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev-2.10.6:0/0::gentoo, installed) USE="" ABI_X86="(64)" ^^^^^^^^^^^

x11-base/xorg-server:0/1.20.11= required by (x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-19.1.0:0/0::gentoo, installed) USE="udev" ABI_X86="(64)" ^^^^^^^^^^^

x11-base/xorg-server:0/1.20.11= required by (x11-drivers/xf86-input-libinput-1.2.0:0/0::gentoo, installed) USE="" ABI_X86="(64)" ^^^^^^^^^^^

-----------------------------8<----------------------------------

If I check the dependencies listed (kde-plasma/kwin, x11-drivers/xf86-video-amdgpu, x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev, x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati, x11-drivers/xf86-input-libinput) I can not see any dependencies "blocking" the 1.20.13-r1 release.

-----------------------------8<----------------------------------
 * These packages depend on x11-base/xorg-server:
kde-plasma/kwin-5.22.5 (x11-base/xorg-server[wayland(-)])
                       (test ? x11-base/xorg-server[xvfb])
x11-drivers/xf86-video-amdgpu-21.0.0 (x11-base/xorg-server[-minimal])
                                     (>=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20[xorg])
                                     (x11-base/xorg-server)
x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev-2.10.6 (>=x11-base/xorg-server-1.18[udev])
                                    (>=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20[xorg])
                                    (x11-base/xorg-server)
x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-19.1.0 (x11-base/xorg-server[-minimal])
                                  (>=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20[xorg])
                                  (x11-base/xorg-server)
x11-drivers/xf86-input-libinput-1.2.0 (>=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20[xorg])
                                      (x11-base/xorg-server)
-----------------------------8<----------------------------------


Have I missed something obvious or is my "logic" flawed?

Any suggestion on how to proceed?

Regards
--
Dan Johansson,
***************************************************
This message is printed on 100% recycled electrons!
***************************************************

Reply via email to