Mark Knecht wrote:
> <SNIP>
>>
>> So while rare, it's not just me.  ;-)  I've had cards fail by just plain
>> refusing not to mount at all, mounting read only and such.  I've never
>> had one to fail like this tho.  I guess if this was some sort of
>> sensitive files, I'd have to put it in a shredder or take a pair of
>> scissors to it.  LOL
>>
>> I ordered 6 new cards as replacements.  They came in yesterday.  Like I
>> said, I wouldn't trust that card even if it started working again.  So,
>> off to the trash the weird card goes.  Now I just have to wonder why dd
>> and such didn't report problems.  :/
>>
>> Thanks to all for the info.  Interesting.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-)  :-)
>>
> Actually, it's possible that it failed this way by design. What if the
> card recognized that it's in some sort of a wear out condition and
> just shut off new writes? One might see it as a failure but a
> different view is as a potential opportunity to retrieve data before
> it's gone.
>
> You might want to check out this tool:
>
> https://github.com/BertoldVdb/sdtool
>
> which advertises that it can view, set and reset the write protection
> status of an SD card. Can't hurt if you're committed to throwing the
> device in the trash can anyway. (Well, it could possibly hose your
> system if you use it incorrectly or if it has bugs, but that's true
> about all software, right?) ;-)
>
> But at least you could view the status of the card.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
>


I downloaded sdtool but I don't have the required devices in /dev to use
it.  In the readme it says not to use /dev/sd* but to use /dev/mmcblk*. 
It seems my card reader doesn't connect in a way for those to be
created.  Would have been nice just to see what it does tho.  I still
wouldn't trust it of course but being curious . . . .

By the way, the card is a Sandisk which has a fairly good reputation. 
It is possible that it failed in the best way it could.  On the positive
side, it did fail in a way that the files could be recovered.  That's
always a good thing.  It's certainly better than failing with no way to
get the files. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 

Reply via email to