On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 02:12, Jack <[email protected]> wrote: > As I said in my reply to Neil, why would this happen in just a handful > of packages, but not in over thirty others? mini_mime is the other > problem package, and it does not use ruby_add_bdepend so there is only > one line with USE_RUBY: 'USE_RUBY="ruby26 ruby27 ruby30 ruby31"'. > > So - why is ruby31 disabled for (so far) only these two packages? > (The other packages which are failing depend on one of these two.)
Maybe these two are just written more strict? I'm unable to read the eclass to determine how it masks these flags on a stable system on these packages, it will happily install it with ruby31 on my unstable system, but you can try to unmask the flag in /etc/portage/package.use.mask dev-ruby/thor -ruby_targets_ruby31 Not the minus sign. Regards, Arve
