On 1/28/23 05:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 09:17:35 GMT Michael wrote:

Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindly
asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it running.
I too am finding it hard to imagine life without gkrellm. I think it needs more
than just a maintainer though - it needs a replacement for upstream as well.

I"m actually the one who first heard that the original maintainer had died.  (I had written to him about some support issue, and got a belated reply from his brother.)  Upstream is not dead at all, the activity level is just fairly low.  I tried to post to -dev, but my message never got through, not sure if it's because I'm not a dev or I made some other error in sending.  The homepage is at htttps://gkrellm.srcbox.net with source at https://git.srcbox.net/gkrellm/gkrellm.

The main problem is that is still uses gtk+2.  They do have an open issue about that, but most of the discussion has been on why it would be so hard to upgrade.  There is apparently a lot of fairly low-level graphics stuff going on, and Bill himself (the original maintainer) said something like the conversion to gkt+3 would be difficult, but to go to gtk+4 (I have no idea how far off this is) would essentially be a re-write.

Jack


Reply via email to