Is your framebuffer device showing in /dev? It should be called
/dev/fb0,1,2..... If yes could you post the output of
$ dmesg | grep fb0

On Sun, Apr 23, 2023, 22:31 <[email protected]> wrote:

> No, I did not change anything, during kernel upgrade only run: make
> oldconfig
>
> but nvidia-drivers-525.105.17 compiled  with a note:
> WARN: setup
> Detected potential configuration issues with used kernel:
>    CONFIG_FB_SIMPLE: is set, recommended to disable and switch to FB_EFI or
>      FB_VESA as it currently may be broken with >=kernel-5.18.13 + NVIDIA:
>      https://github.com/NVIDIA/open-gpu-kernel-modules/issues/341
>      (feel free to ignore this if it works for you)
>
> Though, I got same note compiling nvidia-drivers-470.182.03  and kernel
> boot normally showing text.
>
> WARN: setup
> Detected potential configuration issues with used kernel:
>    CONFIG_FB_SIMPLE: is set, recommended to disable and switch to FB_EFI or
>      FB_VESA as it currently may be broken with >=kernel-5.18.13 + NVIDIA:
>      https://github.com/NVIDIA/open-gpu-kernel-modules/issues/341
>      (feel free to ignore this if it works for you)
>
> I don't use EFI on these systems.
> So make me wonder if has all to do with the nvidia-driver.
>
> On 4/23/23 00:26, David Souza wrote:
> > Did you change something in your kernel config? I had the same problem
> once, because I forgot to enable these kernel options:
> > (From the AMD64 Handbook)
> >
> > Device Drivers
> >      Firmware Drivers --->
> >          EFI (Extensible Firmware Interface) Support --->
> >              <*> EFI Variable Support via sysfs
> >      Graphics support --->
> >          Frame buffer Devices --->
> >              <*> Support for frame buffer devices --->
> >                  [*] EFI-based Framebuffer Support
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > David
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 22, 2023, 20:56 <[email protected] <mailto:
> [email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     I upgraded to kernel 6.1.19 and nvidia-525.105.17
> >
> >     But during boot text is not showing up/scrolling
> >
> >     --
> >     Thelma
> >
>
>

Reply via email to