On Friday, 29 March 2024 19:06:45 GMT Stefan Schmiedl wrote: > > > Michael wrote on Friday, 29. März 2024 18:53:
> > My guess and this is only a guess, is the two binaries are in separate > > subdirectories of /usr and therefore there shouldn't be a problem. Before > > you progress with this you could raise a bug, or try to seek a dev's > > advice on IRC. A fresh backup before you make any changes is definitely > > a good idea. > Quoting the wiki page: > "In addition, the script applies the "sbin merge" at the same time > where /sbin and /usr/sbin are both actually merged to /usr/bin." So while > it is not a problem with split-usr, those two packages will clash with > merged-usr. You're right, they will be in the same subdirectory! ~ $ ls -la /usr total 390 drwxr-xr-x 11 root root 3452 Mar 24 08:52 . drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 4096 Mar 26 15:43 .. drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 118784 Mar 29 16:09 bin drwxr-xr-x 369 root root 53248 Mar 29 13:58 include drwxr-xr-x 34 root root 4096 Mar 24 08:57 lib drwxr-xr-x 88 root root 249856 Mar 29 13:58 lib64 drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 3452 Mar 29 16:09 libexec drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 3452 Jul 23 2023 local lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Mar 24 08:52 sbin -> bin drwxr-xr-x 272 root root 8192 Mar 29 13:58 share drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 3452 Mar 19 15:25 src drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 3452 Jul 23 2023 x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > https://bugs.gentoo.org/928140 > > Thanks, > s. The bug report should hopefully resolve these.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
