On 2026-02-27, Michael wrote: > On Friday, 27 February 2026 13:13:49 Greenwich Mean Time Nuno Silva [...] >> (Now more on point, why is it trying to handle the .partial file as a >> binary package? Wouldn't the point of the suffix be to avoid this?) > > Also shouldn't the checksum step fail? :-/
... yes. Maybe it's just how the code reports errors, using the .partial filename, but before I can even consider trying to look at and understand the portage code possibly involved in this, Erwan: which portage version is this? (Also, which host is it pulling the binpkg from?) -- Nuno Silva
