-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Holly Bostick wrote: > Well, defend it, then :-).
:) > Why should I-- who has further had (very) bad > experiences with the use of PAM, give it another try, when my system > clearly runs without it, which suggests I have no need for it? I'd like to know why. I'm very interested in what your problems were, really. > What overwhelming benefit can I gain, that will offset my previous bad > experience and make what I (because of the bad experience) must consider > a risking my system worthwhile? The first impression is the one that counts. You will probably never change your mind, and I fully and sincerely understand/comprehend you. - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - www.buanzo.com.ar Consultor en Seguridad Informatica / Dominio Digital TV - Da FOSS man! KTP Consultores - info AT ktpconsultores.com.ar Romper un sistema de seguridad los acerca tanto a ser hackers como el encender autos puenteando los convierte en ingenieros automotrices. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDgIvJAlpOsGhXcE0RAmkGAJwLh38R7aNEALtYVAqBUNulUSwJWACcCW7R kFHOg0waqR/w3EK04kjxXC8= =lgeD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
