-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alexander Skwar wrote: > Also on normally sized systems, there just is no > requirement for it - as long as the requirements > are simple enough (eg. LDAP? Go PAM! Database? Go > PAM!). But on consumer systems, and that's what > we're talking about!, you won't need PAM. Not > now, not in the future.
Let's settle this here, then. We've both provided enough arguments, both pro and against our points of view :) Nice discussion, anyway! - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - www.buanzo.com.ar Consultor en Seguridad Informatica / Dominio Digital TV - Da FOSS man! KTP Consultores - info AT ktpconsultores.com.ar Romper un sistema de seguridad los acerca tanto a ser hackers como el encender autos puenteando los convierte en ingenieros automotrices. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDgI9DAlpOsGhXcE0RAkNtAJ41K7mlxQcJ3QDxE/zNwM1LqfuergCeKl4Y 6ZPV6ZtTIP2H45O2NViiyzs= =b1R6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
