On 12/5/05, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In fact, I have -O3 and -j2 ...And I didn't imagine that compiling xmame > could take so much memory. But I already compiled xmame in the past, and > I had no serious problems. Do you think that adding the "joystick" USE > flag made it all growing just too big?
Maybe, but I doubt it. More likely something else in your environment is different. We know that you were running firefox during the compile, and the memory usage there depends heavily upon what web pages you had open and the size of the in-memory cache you have enabled. It could even be a difference in gcc versions: I think recent versions of gcc consume more memory for -O3 (due to more optimizations being enabled) than previous versions. -Richard -- [email protected] mailing list
