surely this would not be slower maybe equal to actually or faster ^^
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 07:04:25AM -0800, Rob Lytle wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 08:00:24 +0100
> Ralph Slooten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Harry Putnam wrote:
> > > The amd64 faq link posted by Ralph Sooten tells a kind of bleak story
> > > as of June 2005 about there being nothing remarkable about 64
> > > performance and futher that 32 bit out performs in many areas.  It is
> > > also said that for `desktop' use there isn't much point.
> > 
> > Somewhere in that FAQ there was a link to the gentoo forum (thread)
> > where I read users were/are having the exact opposite results. They were
> > getting much better results with the 64-bit.
> > 
> > I think at the end this becomes one big debate, just like comparing AMD
> > MHz and Intel MHz.
> > My reasoning on whether to compile in a 64-bit environment, or a 32 is
> > quite simple: if you don't want to "hasle" (which so far has not been as
> > emerge sorts out everything it seems for you) of sometimes letting
> > gentoo do tricks for you to run 32 bit programs with a second set of
> > 32-bit libs etc, then just stick with 32 all the way.
> > If you want to be stubborn (like me) and use your computer like it's
> > "supposed to be", and with a scense of adventure, use 64-bit. At the end
> > of the day I can say "hey guys, I'm running a 64-bit OS" ;-)
> > 
> > 
> 
> My notebook (HP zd8000) has the P4 with 64 bit extensions or emulation
> or whatever it is called.  I am curious about the 64 bit OS's, but
> really have no idea whether there is any advantage whatsever except for
> the experience of using such a system.  I do however, use Complex-128
> variables in Numeric Python.  But since my cpu is under some sort of
> emulation, I don't know if anything would run faster.  Maybe I just
> have to try it to find out.
> 
> Rob.
> 
> -- 
> ------------------
> http://home.comcast.net/~europa100
> A SETI-like Search for Intelligent
> Life in Central Pa.
> -- 
> [email protected] mailing list
> 
-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to