On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:35:37 -0700, Tom Smith wrote:
> 
snip...
> With respect, "officially" Pro and Server are separate products--that 
> is, Pro will run Win2k and WinXP while the current Server product (WTS 
> 3.0) will only run Win9x.
> 
I thought you meant that W4L Pro Was also the server product. I understand
there is only WTS 3 right now and that a new server product is in beta.

> If you have a look at the Win4Lin Pro manual, you'll see a section in it
> pertaining to Terminal Server functionality. What enables the Terminal
> Server functionality is the license code--that came directly from
> Netraverse. I've worked quite extensively with them over the last year
> to (try and) resolve some of the issues I've had with WTS 3. The only
> one to date that remains unresolved is the Num Lock issue (and I will
> try your suggestion if Pro doesn't work out). Here's a link to the
> manual page for Win4Lin--have a look at "Win4Lin Pro 2.0 Users
> Guide"--it contains BOTH Pro and Server information.
> 
Maybe I misunderstand. I always thought Pro was only a client and that the
WTS was a separate product. I don't think PRO can be both. It CAN be a WTS
client. Anyway, I don't use either, so what do I know? :)
snip...
> Actually, I thought the version of Win4Lin in Portage was the Pro
> product (bad assumption on my part) as the package description doesn't
> indicate whether it's Pro or Home.

This is unclear. The 5.1.1 in portage I _think_ is the PRE 9X win4lin
versions. I don't think those packages are maintained anymore since for a
LONG time the kernel patches were absent. Then, the unofficial patcher
"pickledonion" abandoned W4L and shut down his web page. Beginning in
September, after MUCH prodding, W4L Inc. started to try and roll out
kernel patches again. However, by then, it was too late for many, like
myself, who left them.

You might consider posting a bug report to see if the maintainers for the
Win4Lin ebuild would consider upgrading the ebuild (although I _think_ I
read somewhere that W4L 9X is really the same old W4L with a different
name). However, note, there are still problems with the kernel patches, so
I am not sure the maintainers will take up the challenge as long as the
product can't work.

Good luck.

-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to