Philip Webb wrote:

060101 Chris White wrote:
On Sunday 01 January 2006 23:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How slow is too slow for Gentoo? I'm using Gentoo on a 233MHz laptop.
Install did take over a week, I'll admit.
One of the main factor people consider is time ...
... Time is the main factor that draws people away.

Exactly ! I really don't have "over a week" to spend updating a back-up box !
Esp as I have only  1  monitor, so can't use the regular machine meantime !

Of the four machines I have, three are updated over ssh, no monitor at all. Rigs are below. I can even start the updates and then shutdown my main rig, that has the monitor. I login and start a screen session, then start the updates. If I plan to shutdown my main rig for some reason, I do the -f option first since the souces are on my main rig. If I need to shutdown my main rig, I just exit the screen session and logout. I can login later and re-attach the session to see how it's going.

Maybe there is something different about my old Compaq but I don't think it would take me that long, even with one CPU. My install went pretty quick and I did compile everything. I even did a emerge -ev world to make sure.

Maybe I just hate Mandrake to much. LOL Please don't tell me I have to install Mandrake ever again. PLEASE !!!!!

Also keep this in mind, "good things come to those who wait." To me, Gentoo is worth waiting for.

Dale
:-)



--
To err is human, I'm most certainly human.

I have four rigs:

1:  Home built; Abit NF7 ver 2.0 w/ AMD 2500+ CPU, 1GB of ram and right now two 
80GB hard drives.  Named Smoker
2:  Home built; Iwill KK266-R w/ AMD 1GHz CPU, 256MBs of ram and a 4GB drive.  
Named Swifty
3:  Home built; Gigabyte GA-71XE4 w/ 800MHz CPU, 224MBs of ram and a 2.5GB 
drive.  Named Pokey
4:  Compaq Proliant 6000 Server w/ Quad 200MHz CPUs, 128MBs of ram and a 4.3GB 
SCSI drive.  Named Putput

All run Gentoo Linux, all run folding. #1 is my desktop, 2, 3, and 4 are set up as servers.
--
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to